← Workflows

阅读中文版本

Environment Version Matrix Workflow

Document and manage which versions run in each environment so support and upgrade planning rest on facts.

beginner~40 minenvironmentversioninggovernance

Objective

Maintain a clear version matrix across environments to support upgrade planning.

Environment

  • Deployment metadata
  • A matrix document or dashboard
  • Upgrade policies

Steps

1. Record versions per environment

Capture application and dependency versions running in each environment.

Expected state: A version matrix exists and is current.

2. Identify skew

Find environments running versions that differ from the intended standard.

Expected state: Undesired version skew is visible.

3. Plan upgrades

Sequence upgrades to close skew without breaking dependencies.

Expected state: Upgrades are planned, not ad hoc.

4. Keep the matrix current

Update the matrix automatically from deployment data.

Expected state: The matrix does not go stale.

Decision points

Standardise versions or allow skew?

  • Minimise skew, allow justified exceptions
  • Allow full independence

Minimise version skew; justified exceptions should be documented.

Manual or automated matrix?

  • Automated from deployment data
  • Manually updated

Automate so the matrix cannot go stale.

Expected outcome

Version state across environments is known, enabling planned upgrades instead of reactive ones.

Verification

Confirm the matrix is current, skew is identified, and upgrades follow the plan.

Cleanup

Archive historical matrices for audit and trend analysis.

Overview

Maintain a clear version matrix across environments to support upgrade planning.

This workflow is reusable across teams and environments; adapt the commands to your tooling while keeping the sequence and checkpoints intact.

Environment and prerequisites

  • Deployment metadata
  • A matrix document or dashboard
  • Upgrade policies

Procedure

1. Record versions per environment

Capture application and dependency versions running in each environment.

Expected state: A version matrix exists and is current.

2. Identify skew

Find environments running versions that differ from the intended standard.

Expected state: Undesired version skew is visible.

3. Plan upgrades

Sequence upgrades to close skew without breaking dependencies.

Expected state: Upgrades are planned, not ad hoc.

4. Keep the matrix current

Update the matrix automatically from deployment data.

Expected state: The matrix does not go stale.

# list deployed versions by environment
for env in dev staging prod; do echo "$env: $(deploy_info --env $env --version)"; done

Verification

Confirm the matrix is current, skew is identified, and upgrades follow the plan.

Decision points

Standardise versions or allow skew?

  • Minimise skew, allow justified exceptions
  • Allow full independence

Recommendation: Minimise version skew; justified exceptions should be documented.

Manual or automated matrix?

  • Automated from deployment data
  • Manually updated

Recommendation: Automate so the matrix cannot go stale.

Common failures

  • Unknown version skew causes support confusion.
  • Ad-hoc upgrades create dependency surprises.
  • A stale matrix misleads planning.