← Recipes

阅读中文版本

Limit GraphQL Query Depth to Prevent Nested Abuse

Set a max depth of 7 so a malicious query like { user { posts { user { posts ... } } } } is rejected before execution.

~20 minapigraphqlsecurity

Task

Implement const validation = depthLimit(7)(document); if (!validation.valid) throw new Error('too deep'); so the service degrades gracefully under failure instead of cascading timeouts to callers.

When to use this

A downstream service slows down and without const validation = depthLimit(7)(document); if (!validation.valid) throw new Error('too deep'); the upstream exhausts its thread pool in 12 seconds.

Prerequisites

  • A service with inter-service calls or external dependencies
  • A retry or circuit breaker library available

Steps

1. Configure const validation = depthLimit(7)(document); if (!validation.valid) throw new Error('too deep'); in the project configuration file with the recommended defaults.

const validation = depthLimit(7)(document); if (!validation.valid) throw new Error('too deep');

Expected output: The configuration is accepted and const validation = depthLimit(7)(document); if (!validation.valid) throw new Error('too deep'); runs without errors on the first invocation.

2. Run the check locally to verify const validation = depthLimit(7)(document); if (!validation.valid) throw new Error('too deep'); produces the expected result before pushing.

pnpm test

Expected output: Local run matches CI behavior; no surprises after push.

3. Add the gate to the CI pipeline so const validation = depthLimit(7)(document); if (!validation.valid) throw new Error('too deep'); blocks merge on failure.

- name: Run add graphql depth limit
  run: pnpm test

Expected output: Pull requests with failing const validation = depthLimit(7)(document); if (!validation.valid) throw new Error('too deep'); are blocked from merging.

Troubleshooting

Problem

The check passes locally but fails in CI

Solution

Pin dependency versions and the runtime to match CI exactly; reproduce with the same Docker image or act.

Problem

Configuration is rejected with a schema error

Solution

Check the tool version matches the config schema; older versions may not support newer fields.

Limitations

  • The gate only runs on events that trigger the workflow; locally pushed commits bypass it.
  • Configuration drift is possible if someone edits settings outside version control.

Isolate failure

Start by measuring the problem. Set a max depth of 7 so a malicious query like { user { posts { user { posts … } } } } is rejected before execution. The most common mistake is adding the gate without first confirming it catches the issue you care about. Run const validation = depthLimit(7)(document); if (!validation.valid) throw new Error(‘too deep’); against the current codebase and inspect the output before wiring it into CI.

const validation = depthLimit(7)(document); if (!validation.valid) throw new Error('too deep');

Verify graceful degradation

Once the gate is in place, make failures actionable. A failing const validation = depthLimit(7)(document); if (!validation.valid) throw new Error(‘too deep’); should point to the exact file and line, not a generic error. Pin the tool version in the lockfile so a upstream release does not silently change behavior. Review the gate output in every pull request just like a test result.